Custom Report Excerpts:
China, Czech Republic, Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iraq, Jordan +14 more
China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) – Hong Kong
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) – Macau
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) – Tibet
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Côte d’Ivoire
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Crimea
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Czech Republic
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Egypt
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Hungary
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Iraq
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Jordan
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Malaysia
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Mexico
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Morocco
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Oman
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Poland
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Russia
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Serbia
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Slovakia
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
South Africa
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Thailand
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Turkey
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
Ukraine
Section 6. Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
During the year the OHCHR and human rights groups documented fewer incidents of xenophobic societal violence and discrimination, compared with a spike in these incidents in 2018. Civil society groups remained concerned, however, about the lack of accountability for crimes committed by radical groups in cases documented in 2018. During the year members of such groups committed violent attacks on ethnic minorities (especially Roma), LGBTI persons, feminists, and other individuals they considered to be “un-Ukrainian” or “anti-Ukrainian.” The HRMMU noted that the failure of police and prosecutors to prevent these acts of violence, properly classify them as hate crimes, and effectively investigate and prosecute them created an environment of impunity and lack of justice for victims.
There were continued reports that the government provided grant funds to or cooperated with radical groups. For example, according to monitoring by independent investigative media outlet Bellingcat, during the year the Ministry of Youth and Sport awarded 845,000 hryvnias ($35,000) to groups–such as National Corps and C14 that have committed violence against minorities–to run “national-patriotic education projects” for children.